Advances, Systems and Applications
Table 3 Computation cost comparison
Computation Party | [23] | [24] | [25] | [28] | The proposed AMAKAS scheme |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
User | 4\({T}_{h}\)+2\({T}_{P}\)+2\({T}_{m}\) | 11\({T}_{h}\)+2\({T}_{P}\) | 10\({T}_{h}\)+2\({T}_{P}\)+\(1{T}_{AED}\) | 8\({T}_{h}\)+\(2{T}_{P}\)+\({3T}_{m}\)+\({1T}_{F}\) | \(10{T}_{h}+2{T}_{P}\) |
(ms) | 4.5188 | 4.4773 | 8.325 | 6.7828 | 4.475 |
Server | 6\({T}_{h}\)+2\({T}_{P}\)+3\({T}_{m}\) | 6\({T}_{h}\)+\({1T}_{inv}\) | 4\({T}_{h}\)+1\({T}_{P}\) | 5\({T}_{h}\)+3\({T}_{P}\)+\(4{T}_{m}\) | 5\({T}_{h}\)+2\({T}_{P}\) |
(ms) | 4.5522 | ≈ 190.189E + 06 | 2.2352 | 6.8116 | 4.4635 |
Total | 10\({T}_{h}\)+4\({T}_{P}\)+5\({T}_{m}\) | 17\({T}_{h}\)+2\({T}_{P}\)+\(1{T}_{inv}\) | 14\({T}_{h}\)+3\({T}_{P}\)+\(1{T}_{AED}\) | 13\({T}_{h}\)+5\({T}_{P}\)+7\({T}_{m}\)+\(1{T}_{F}\) | \(15{T}_{h}+4{T}_{P}\) |
(ms) | 9.071 | 190.189E + 06 | 10.5602 | 13.5944 | 8.9385 |