Advances, Systems and Applications
Table 1 Comparison summary of surveyed systems
Cloud security implementation | Reduces attack surface (lines of code) | Malware detection | Mitigates zero-day threats | Added overhead (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Malaware | > 725Â K | Yes | No | No data |
Guest view casting | > 1,600Â K | Yes | No | Reduced up to 70% |
Virtual snort | > 300Â K | Yes | No | No data |
Hybrid IDS | > 300Â K | Yes | No | ~4-36% |
VMwall | ~ 1,600Â K | Yes | No | 1-7% |
ReVirt | ~ 1,800Â K | No | Yes | 8-58% |
NSE-H | > 1,600Â K | No | No | 15% |
Shype | ~ 11Â k | No | No | < 1% |
Shype with Chinese wall in critical path | > 1,600Â K | No | No | 9.1% |
Shype with Chinese wall outside critical path | > 1,600Â k | No | No | < 1% |
NoHype | < 1,600Â K | No | No | Reduced up to 1% |
CReW | > 270Â K | Yes | Yes | ~48-347% |
Hypervisor-based proactive recovery | ~ 1,600Â K | Yes | Yes | ~8-12.7% |
Bear | ~ 11Â k | Not applicable | Yes | < 1% |