Advances, Systems and Applications
Table 10 RM-DCWF vs MRCP-RM: effect of λ on T and O
From: A resource management technique for processing deadline-constrained multi-stage workflows
λ (jobs/s) | T (sec) | O (sec) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | RM-DCWF | MRCP-RM | RM-DCWF | MRCP-RM |
0.001 | 383 ± 2 | 383 ± 2 | 0.010 ± 0 | 0.018 ± 0 |
0.01 | 395 ± 2 | 394 ± 2 | 0.010 ± 0 | 0.043 ± 0 |
0.015 | 413 ± 2 | 417 ± 2 | 0.010 ± 0 | 0.074 ± 0 |
0.175 | 429 ± 2 | 435 ± 2.5 | 0.012 ± 0 | 0.10 ± 0 |
0.1875 | 444 ± 3 | 450 ± 3 | 0.013 ± 0 | 0.12 ± 0 |
0.02 | 465 ± 4 | 471 ± 3 | 0.012 ± 0 | 0.18 ± 0.01 |
0.02125 | 502 ± 6 | 508 ± 6 | 0.016 ± 0 | 0.25 ± 0.02 |
0.0225 | 564 ± 12 | 566 ± 10 | 0.019 ± 0 | 0.43 ± 0.04 |
0.025 | 1332 ± 76 | 1788 ± 118 | 0.110 ± 0 | 2.9 ± 0.48 |