Table 2 Comparison of existing frameworks part-1

Improve execution cost

Y

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

Minimum execution time

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Y

N

N

Power consumption

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

Maximum resource utilization

N/A

Y

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N

N

N

Caching support

N/A

N/A

N/A

N

N

N

Y

N/A

N/A

Scalability

N

Y

N

Y

Y

N

Y

N

N

Complexity

N/A

N/A

N/A

L

H

L

L

L

N/A

Augmentation of resource transparency

N

N

N

N

Y

N

N/A

N/A

N/A

Programmer support

N

N

Y

N/A

N/A

Y

N/A

N

Y

Parallel execution support

N/A

N/A

N/A

N

N

N

N

Y

N/A

Maximum throughput

N

Y

N

N

N

N

N/A

N/A

N/A

Network latency

L

N

L

L

L

L

L

L

H

Optimize bandwidth utilization

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N

N

N

QoS

N/A

N

Y

N

N/A

N

N/A

N/A

Y

Guaranteed Bandwidth

N/A

N/A

N/A

N

N

N

N

N/A

Y

Network Load

N/A

N/A

N/A

H

L

L

L

L

N/A

Transmission delay

L

H

H

N/A

N/A

L

N/A

M

L

Reduction in number of hops

N/A

N/A

N/A

Y

Y

Y

Y

N/A

N

Security overhead

M

N/A

N/A

N/A

M

N/A

M

N/A

H

Fault tolerance

N

N

Y

N/A

N/A

Y

N/A

N

Y

Pre-execution delay

N/A

N/A

N/A

H

H

H

M

N/A

N/A

Usage of high bandwidth links

N/A

N/A

N/A

Y

Y

Y

Y

N/A

Y

Reduce of floading

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N

N

Y

time Optimize data transfer cost

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Y

Y

Y