Advances, Systems and Applications
Table 9 Performance results of scenario 1
Fog device → Network connection → Cloud geo-location | Throughput (requests/year) | Service Time (ms) |
|---|---|---|
Netbook → Ethernet → São Paulo | 15,738,041.69 | 1851.17 |
Netbook → Ethernet → California | 15,736,826.80 | 2300.51 |
Netbook → Ethernet → London | 15,736,728.23 | 2352.86 |
Netbook → Ethernet → Tokyo | 15,736,220.39 | 2664.78 |
Netbook → IEEE 802.11 → São Paulo | 15,737,640.90 | 1962.35 |
Netbook → IEEE 802.11 → California | 15,736,364.61 | 2567.16 |
Netbook → IEEE 802.11 → London | 15,736,259.12 | 2635.18 |
Netbook → IEEE 802.11 → Tokyo | 15,735,924.73 | 2890.17 |
Raspberry Pi → Ethernet → São Paulo | 15,737,979.44 | 1867.21 |
Raspberry Pi → Ethernet → California | 15,736,792.77 | 2318.46 |
Raspberry Pi → Ethernet → London | 15,736,760.02 | 2332.73 |
Raspberry Pi → Ethernet → Tokyo | 15,736,212.84 | 2671.46 |
Raspberry Pi → IEEE 802.11 → São Paulo | 15,737,907.39 | 1881.88 |
Raspberry Pi → IEEE 802.11 → California | 15,736,725.89 | 2354.14 |
Raspberry Pi → IEEE 802.11 → London | 15,736,664.17 | 2386.73 |
Raspberry Pi → IEEE 802.11 → Tokyo | 15,736,124.07 | 2732.74 |