Skip to main content

Advances, Systems and Applications

Journal of Cloud Computing Cover Image

Table 9 Performance results of scenario 1

From: Analyzing the availability and performance of an e-health system integrated with edge, fog and cloud infrastructures

Fog device → Network connection → Cloud geo-location Throughput (requests/year) Service Time (ms)
Netbook → Ethernet → São Paulo 15,738,041.69 1851.17
Netbook → Ethernet → California 15,736,826.80 2300.51
Netbook → Ethernet → London 15,736,728.23 2352.86
Netbook → Ethernet → Tokyo 15,736,220.39 2664.78
Netbook → IEEE 802.11 → São Paulo 15,737,640.90 1962.35
Netbook → IEEE 802.11 → California 15,736,364.61 2567.16
Netbook → IEEE 802.11 → London 15,736,259.12 2635.18
Netbook → IEEE 802.11 → Tokyo 15,735,924.73 2890.17
Raspberry Pi → Ethernet → São Paulo 15,737,979.44 1867.21
Raspberry Pi → Ethernet → California 15,736,792.77 2318.46
Raspberry Pi → Ethernet → London 15,736,760.02 2332.73
Raspberry Pi → Ethernet → Tokyo 15,736,212.84 2671.46
Raspberry Pi → IEEE 802.11 → São Paulo 15,737,907.39 1881.88
Raspberry Pi → IEEE 802.11 → California 15,736,725.89 2354.14
Raspberry Pi → IEEE 802.11 → London 15,736,664.17 2386.73
Raspberry Pi → IEEE 802.11 → Tokyo 15,736,124.07 2732.74