Advances, Systems and Applications
Table 8 Experiments for Performance Comparison between PSAACO and Other Algorithms
| Â | Â | BF | SP | WF | PSAACO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPP model1 | Path length[m] | 308.20 | 314.00 | 296.50 | 288.20 |
| Â | Turning angle[deg] | 630.00 | 548.13 | 720.00 | 495.00 |
| Â | Energy consumption[KJ] | 46.77 | 46.03 | 46.97 | 42.11 |
| Â | Completion time[sec] | 51.82 | 49.67 | 53.65 | 45.32 |
CPP model2 | Path length[m] | 2085.00 | 1793.50 | 1633.10 | 1600.00 |
| Â | Turning angle[deg] | 2507.28 | 1771.02 | 2970.00 | 1440.00 |
| Â | Energy consumption[KJ] | 286.07 | 239.40 | 241.47 | 211.15 |
| Â | Completion time[sec] | 292.08 | 238.38 | 262.31 | 208.00 |
CPP model3 | Path length[m] | 2786.40 | 2472.90 | 2009.10 | 1917.90 |
| Â | Turning angle[deg] | 3166.26 | 3031.02 | 3510.00 | 1890.00 |
| Â | Energy consumption[KJ] | 379.11 | 340.28 | 294.58 | 255.94 |
| Â | Completion time[sec] | 384.18 | 348.32 | 317.91 | 254.79 |