Skip to main content

Advances, Systems and Applications

Table 9 Comparative Assessment of Deep-ConvLSTM_FPO Scheme With Task Size 400

From: Task grouping and optimized deep learning based VM sizing for hosting containers as a service

Number of Iteration

VM size selection technique

Hurst exponent+Markov transition

ICLB

OM-FNN

VM size IaaS multi-tenant public cloud

Deep-ConvLSTM GD

Deep-ConvLSTM ADAM

Proposed Deep-ConvLSTM_FPO

Resource Utilization

5

0.1522

0.1460

0.1347

0.1331

0.1328

0.1312

0.1301

0.1279

10

0.1842

0.1675

0.1525

0.1494

0.1476

0.1437

0.1401

0.1325

15

0.1798

0.1714

0.1568

0.1537

0.1519

0.1501

0.1500

0.1479

20

0.1963

0.1748

0.1619

0.1595

0.1568

0.1537

0.1517

0.1488

Response Time

5

68881

58878

46085

40123

23119

15457

981

634

10

68910

61906

46115

40475

23292

15843

1036

697

15

68765

62762

45951

40734

23171

16284

1091

619

20

68984

63981

46207

40982

23250

16790

1158

693

Task Rejection Rate

5

0.4585

0.4413

0.4326

0.4235

0.4126

0.4087

0.4037

0.3855

10

0.4659

0.4585

0.4488

0.4458

0.4325

0.4268

0.4179

0.3959

15

0.4854

0.4785

0.4585

0.4529

0.4458

0.4379

0.4268

0.4014

20

0.4986

0.4876

0.4785

0.4654

0.4587

0.4479

0.4368

0.4113

Makespan

5

0.8765

0.8578

0.8236

0.7967

0.7865

0.6654

0.6467

0.6256

10

0.8578

0.8467

0.7976

0.7867

0.7755

0.6976

0.6654

0.6578

15

0.8367

0.8076

0.7765

0.7654

0.7578

0.7367

0.7245

0.6976

20

0.8087

0.7865

0.7578

0.7467

0.7367

0.7268

0.7226

0.7156